From “writing articles/posts in a traditional blogging sense” to “planting a digital garden”
“A garden is a collection of evolving ideas that aren’t strictly organized by their publication date.” — A Brief History & Ethos of the Digital Garden
A digital garden is a hybrid between a personal blog and a wiki — a public space for collecting, cultivating, and connecting ideas over time. Instead of publishing finished articles, you plant seeds of thought and let them grow, evolve, and build up over time.
Key characteristics:
- Topology over chronology — notes are organized by contextual associations (bi-directional linking), not by publication date.
- Evergreen — never finished; continuously edited, updated, and refined.
- Exploratory — invites wandering; every visit can take a different path through the garden.
- Personal — a conversation with yourself as much as with your readers.
-
Paginated, linear, newest-first sorted (sorting posts by dates) oriented list of chronologically posts aren’t how people actually use the internet. They search via Google to find stuff, which is free-form and task-oriented.
Curation is more important!
-
Everybody is treating writing as a “content marketing strategy” and using it to “build a personal brand” which leads to the fundamental flawed idea that everything you post has to be polished to perfection and ready to be consumed.
- Enables leveraging the knowledge of other mind explorers / fellow gardeners and contributes to the growth of our collective intelligence. 1
- Learn In Public — sharing your learning journey openly compounds knowledge and attracts fellow gardeners who can correct, extend, and build on your work.
- Digital Garden Terms of Service — a playful “license” for borrowing and sharing ideas across gardens.
Three metaphors describe the different ways people share on the web:
- The Stream (e.g., Twitter, RSS feeds) — time-ordered, serialized content.
- You jump in and let it flow past. You feel the force of it hit you as things float by.
- The Stream replaces topology with serialization—rather than imagine a timeless world of connection and multiple paths, the Stream presents us with a single, time-ordered path with our experience (and only our experience) at the center. — The Stream vs The Garden
- The Campfire (e.g., a blog) — a fixed center where an audience gathers around a conversation.
- The Garden (e.g., a personal wiki) — a space you walk through.
- You walk through, look around it, and follow it to its end.
- The “web as topology” or the “web as space”: Every walk through the garden creates new paths, new meanings, and when we add things to the garden we add them in a way that allows many future, unpredicted relationships.
- We create the garden as a sort of experience generator—so that the visitors can have unique yet coherent experiences as they find their own paths through the garden. — The Stream vs The Garden
See also: Streams (Twitter), Campfires (Blog), and Gardens (Personal Wiki) — Tom Critchlow
“Gardens and parks lie between farmland and wilderness. The garden is farmland that delights the senses, designed for delight rather than commodity. The park is wilderness, tamed for our enjoyment. Since most hypertext aims neither for the wilderness of unplanned content, nor for the straight rows of formal organization, gardens and parks can inspire a new approach to hypertext design and can help us understand the patterns we observe in fine hypertext writing.” — Gardens
From A Brief History & Ethos of the Digital Garden:
- A garden is a collection of evolving ideas that aren’t strictly organized by their publication date.
- Inherently exploratory. Linked through contextual associations (bi-directional linking) to connect notes together. (while a blog may usually be explored in chronological order)
- Not refined or completed yet → always disorganized, never ends → rough drafts, WIP (work-in-progress)—digital gardeners keep on editing and updating their notes → can be published as raw, unpolished, incomplete, half-finished/baked/formed thoughts that will incrementally grow, evolve, and build up over time (while posts/articles/essays in a blog have a strict publication date and quickly start decaying/become outdated as soon as they are published since the author will learn new things)
Write to share & learn, not to teach
- With blogging, you’re talking to a large audience. With digital gardening, you’re talking to yourself—you focus on what you want to cultivate over time.
- Long Content — ideas worth cultivating take time and space to grow.
“Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap but by the seeds you plant.” — Robert Louis Stevenson
- Water your digital garden: regularly review and prune your notes. A neglected capture system becomes just another source of overwhelm.
- Plant seeds, then cultivate: capture fleeting thoughts, then grow them into evergreen notes.
- Connect, don’t file: link notes through contextual associations (Linking Your Thinking), rather than forcing them into rigid hierarchies.
- Designing better file organization around tags, not hierarchies
My digital garden is a growing collection of thoughts, ideas, and knowledge I’ve gathered from various topics that spark my curiosity. The notes are synced directly from my Obsidian workspace, making this space a living reflection of my evolving interests and discoveries.
Just as I have learned so much from other people’s gardens, I hope every visitor can learn something from mine.
I water my digital garden every single day — review, prune, and grow notes as part of my daily routine.
-
Crowdsourcing is a portmanteau of “crowd” and “outsourcing” coined in 2006 by Jeff Howe and Mark Robinson, to describe how businesses (digital platforms) were using the Internet to “outsource work to the crowd.” It involves attracting and dividing work between a large group of dispersed participants to achieve a cumulative result. The online dictionary Merriam-Webster defines it as: “the practice of obtaining needed services, ideas, or content by soliciting contributions from a large group of people and especially from the online community rather than from traditional employees or suppliers.” ⌃
